Previous 148 / 148 Next

04/02/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly [41] As stated earlier, Sec. 57 of IPRA, insofar as it grants them such priority, is constitutional. Source: Supreme Court E-Library This page was dynamically generated by the E-Library Content Management System (E-LibCMS) elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/36882 148/148

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

ISAGANI CRUZ v. HON. JUAN M .FLAVIER et. al (SECRETARY OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, SECRETARY OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT and CHAIRMAN and COMMISSIONERS OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES)

Jurisprudence

Case number: G.R. No. 135385

Division: En Banc

Date of decision: Dis 6, 2000

Year of decision: 2000

Nature of the case: This suit for prohibition and mandamus as citizens and taxpayers, assailing the constitutionality of certain provisions of Republic Act No. 8371 (R.A. 8371), otherwise known as the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act of 1997 (IPRA), and its Implementing Rules and Regulations (Implementing Rules)

Observatory: Indigenous Peoples Rights

Primary Documents

G.R. No. 135385
Other
Download View

Commission on Human Rights

Select target paragraph3

ISAGANI CRUZ v. HON. JUAN M .FLAVIER et. al (SECRETARY OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, SECRETARY OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT and CHAIRMAN and COMMISSIONERS OF THE NATIONAL COMMISSION ON INDIGENOUS PEOPLES)

Primary Documents

Notifications