Memorandum for the Petitioners | 71
have contributed to climate change, to impose on them specific and particular
obligations in respect of the human rights impacts of climate change.”””*
6.13. References to the respondents in the Petition, Consolidated
Reply, and this memorandum “should be taken as a reference to the parent
entity or entities in whose name the accounts of the group are consolidated in
accordance with the rules of the jurisdiction in which the parent is
incorporated or listed for trading on a stock exchange. This is the intent of
the petitioners’ pleadings, and as supported by the UNGPs, apply to “all
business enterprises, both transnational and others, regardless of their size,
sector, location, ownership and structure.”?”?
6.14. For
purposes
of issuing
a final
report
and/or
resolution
concerning this National Inquiry, the Honorable Commission can “adopt an
enterprise theory of corporate personhood[;] meaning[,] that the activities of
the whole group of companies (and specifically the greenhouse gas emissions
attributable to the group as a whole) should be aggregated and attributed to
the parent entity.”
E.
Respondents’
moral
and __ legal
responsibility
under
general
principles of tort and human rights
law
6.15. Finally, under fundamental principles of responsibility that are
common to judicial systems around the world, respondents can ultimately be
held legally responsible for the harms being suffered by communities. The
fossil fuel companies had early awareness, notice, and actual knowledge of
the role of coal, oil, and gas products in causing climate change and the
reasonably foreseeable human rights harms resulting from climate impacts.
6.16.
Significantly, fossil fuel companies had the opportunity to avoid
or reduce those harms. However, their past and current activities -- including
the extraction, marketing, and sale of fossil fuels -- and past and current efforts
to undermine climate science and solutions have contributed and continue to
materially contribute to the climate damage resulting in human rights harms*°!
to petitioners and Filipinos, in general.
298 Joint Summary of the Amicus Curiae, supra note 50, p. 62.
29 Ibid.
300 Ibid.
3°! bid.
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents