3/31/2021
E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly
[34] Id.
[35] Id. at 24.
[36] Id. at 156-162.
[37] Id. at 34-35.
[38] CrewLink, Inc., et al. v. Teringtering, et al., 697 Phil. 302, 309 (2012).
[39] Id.
[40] Guerrero v. Philippine Transmarine Carriers. Inc., et al., G.R. No. 222523, October
3, 2018.
[41] Rollo, pp. 61-62.
[42] Id. at 63.
[43] Id. at 64.
[44] Symex Security Services, Inc., et al. v. Rivera, Jr., et al., G.R. No. 202613,
November 8, 2017, 844 SCRA 416, 436, citing Perea v. Elburg Shipmanagement
Philippines, Inc., G.R. No. 206178, August 9, 2017, 836 SCRA 431 and Madridejos v.
NYK-FIL Ship Management, Inc., G.R. No. 204262, June 7, 2017, 826 SCRA 452.
[45] Madridejos v. NYK-Fil Ship Management, Inc., 810 Phil. 704, 724 (2017).
[46] PNB v. Dalmacio, 813 Phil. 127, 132 (2017), citing Cabling v. Dangcalan, 787 Phil.
187, 197 (2016).
[47] In certain exceptional cases, the Court may be urged to probe and resolve factual
issues, viz.: (a) When the findings are grounded entirely on speculation, surmises, or
conjectures; (b) When the inference made is manifestly mistaken, absurd, or
impossible; (c) When there is grave abuse of discretion; (d) When the judgment is
based on a misapprehension of facts; (e) When the findings of facts are conflicting; (f)
When in making its findings the CA went beyond the issues of the case, or its findings
are contrary to the admissions of both the appellant and the appellee; (g) When the
CA's findings are contrary to those by the trial court; (h) When the findings are
conclusions without citation of specific evidence on which they are based; i) When the
facts set forth in the petition, as well as in the petitioner's main and reply briefs, are
not disputed by the respondent; j) When the findings of fact are premised on the
supposed absence of evidence and contradicted by the evidence on record; or (k) When
the CA manifestly overlooked certain relevant facts not disputed by the parties, which,
if properly considered, would justify a different conclusion. See De Vera, et al. v. Sps.
Santiago, et al., 761 Phil. 90, 105 (2015).
[48] Rollo, p. 116.
[49] Id. at 121.
https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/65972
10/12