4/13/2021 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly [39] G.R. No. 231111, October 17, 2018. [40] Philippine Overseas Employment Administration Memorandum Circular No. 10, series of 2010, Sec. 20(A). [41] 765 Phil. 341 (2015). [42] Id. at 362-363. [43] See: Orient Hope Agencies, Inc. v. Jara, G.R. No. 204307. June 6, 2018. 864 SCRA 428, where a surgical procedure performed 159 days from repatriation as held to constitute sufficient justification for the extension of the period provided in the POEASEC, even absent a complete and definite medical assessment. [44] Rollo, p. 164. [45] CIVIL CODE, Art. 1700. [46] The late Alberto B. Javier v. Philippine Transmarine Carriers. Inc., 738 Phil. 374, 389 (2014). [47] Reyes v. Glaucoma Research Foundation, Inc., 760 Phil. 779, 794 (2015). [48] Phil. Long Distance Telephone Company v. Honrado, 652 Phil. 331, 339 (2010). [49] Auza, Jr. v. MOL Philippines, Inc., 699 Phil. 62, 67 (2012). Source: Supreme Court E-Library This page was dynamically generated by the E-Library Content Management System (E-LibCMS) https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/66178 12/12