According to Quizon and Ravanera (2017), there are three major factors
driving this global rush for land. The first is the rise in world food prices that
started in the 1990s and reached its peak in 2006-2008, triggering a global food
crisis. In 2008, the food insecurity of food-importing countries intensified as
the top food-exporting nations halted their exports from the world market in
order to protect their own consumers. In response, wealthy import-dependent
countries (such as Japan and Middle East countries) began acquiring farmlands
overseas to directly produce their own food and reduce dependence on world
markets. This land acquisition drive continues even after the food crisis had
abated.
The second driver is the growth of the biofuel industry, which became
attractive because of the sudden rise in oil prices and western governments’
increasing support for renewable fuels. Rising world energy consumption,
continuing instability in the Middle East, and China’s rapid industrial growth
have all contributed to rising oil prices.
Lastly, “large-scale land acquisition is also driven by logging, mining,
real estate tourism and the creation of special economic zones and enclaves”
(Quizon and Ravanera, 2017). Quizon and Ravanera (2017) assert that “host
governments have welcomed these new land investments as a means to
offset declining public investments in agriculture and a reduction in official
development assistance for agriculture.” In order to attract these foreign
investments, cash-strapped governments offer tax holidays, subsidies,
exemptions, repatriation of profits and other incentives.
“While foreign investors are typically large, wealthy transnational firms
or rich governments, host countries are usually poor or embroiled in political
conflict” (Ibid). A 2010 World Bank report noted that “investors are targeting
countries with weak laws, buying arable land on the cheap, and failing to deliver
promises on jobs and investments…”
It is in this context that human rights abuses also occur. Quizon and
Ravanera (2017) aver that “many of these land deals are consummated outside
of public knowledge and scrutiny. With little prior information or consultation,
local communities are caught unaware until the moment when they are evicted
or land clearing operations begin.” It is also not uncommon for harassment or
intimidation to be involved in getting communities to vacate lands. In various
situations, military personnel, paramilitary units and private security forces have
20
Upholding Land Rights amidst the Land Rush
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents