Q While you were classmates with [AAA], did you see anything that Wingwing did to [AAA]? A Yes sir. Q What did you see that Wingwing did to [AAA]? A While [we] were walking, he blocked our way and he told us to go down so that he will give [AAA] candy and when we did not go, he let [AAA] sit down. Q After he let [AAA] sit down, what did he do to [AAA]? A He held her vagina. Q After he held the vagina of [AAA], what did he do next, if you have seen any? A We went home. Q How many times did you see Wingwing hold the vagina of [AAA]? A Once only. Q Did you tell this to the police? A No sir. Q I'm showing you a document with a name Jomie Uyan and above it is a signature, will you see whose signature is this? A Mine sir. Q Is that your signature? A Yes sir. Q So you recall that a policeman went to talk to you about what Wingwing did to [AAA]? A Yes sir. Q Did you tell also the police that Wingwing removed the panty of [AAA]? A Yes sir. Q And it was after this Wingwing removed the panty that he played the vagina of [AAA]? A Yes sir.[22] The trial court found the testimonies of Michael and Jamie to be straightforward, categorical and convincing. It is settled that the assessment of the credibility of

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents