129.
1
In 1998, API, on behalf of Defendants, among other fossil fuel companies and
2
organizations supported by fossil fuel corporate grants, developed a Global Climate Science
3
Communications Plan that stated that unless “climate change becomes a non-issue . . . there may
4
be no moment when we can declare victory for our efforts.” Rather, API proclaimed that “[v]ictory
5
will be achieved when . . . average citizens ‘understand’ (recognize) uncertainties in climate
6
science; [and when] recognition of uncertainties becomes part of the ‘conventional wisdom.’”109
7
The multi-million-dollar, multi-year proposed budget included public outreach and the
8
dissemination of educational materials to schools to “begin to erect a barrier against further efforts
9
to impose Kyoto-like measures in the future.”110
130.
10
Soon after, API distributed a memo to its members identifying public agreement on
11
fossil fuel products’ role in climate change as its highest priority issue.111 The memorandum
12
illuminates API’s and Defendants’ concern over the potential regulation of Defendants’ fossil fuel
13
products: “Climate is at the center of the industry’s business interests. Policies limiting carbon
14
emissions reduce petroleum product use. That is why it is API’s highest priority issue and defined
15
as ‘strategic.’”112 Further, the API memo stresses many of the strategies that Defendants
16
individually and collectively utilized to combat the perception of their fossil fuel products as
17
hazardous. These included:
a.
18
Influencing the tenor of the climate change “debate” as a means to establish
19
that efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions were not necessary to
20
responsibly address climate change;
b.
21
Maintaining strong working relationships between government regulators
22
and communications-oriented organizations like the Global Climate
23
Coalition, the Heartland Institute, and other groups carrying Defendants’
24
25
26
27
28
SHER
EDLING LLP
109
Joe Walker, E-mail to Global Climate Science Team, attaching the Draft Global Science Communications Plan
(Apr. 3, 1998), https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/784572/api-global-climate-science-communicationsplan.pdf.
110
Id.
111
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Allegations of Political Interference with Government Climate
Change Science, page 51 (Mar. 19, 2007), https://ia601904.us.archive.org/25/items/gov.gpo.fdsys.CHRG110hhrg37415/CHRG-110hhrg37415.pdf.
112
Id.
COMPLAINT
59
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents