Given these circumstances, petitioner concludes that respondent Skills International should be held liable to him for the illegal dismissal perpetuated by its accredited principal, Wallan Al Wallan, as provided for under Section [60] of the Rules and Regulations Implementing the Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipinos Act of 1995[21] which states:               Section 60.  Solidary Liability. - The liability of the principal/employer and the recruitment/placement agency on any and all claims under this Rule shall be joint and solidary.  This liability shall be incorporated in the contract for overseas employment and shall be a condition precedent for its approval.  The performance bond to be filed by the recruitment/placement agency, as provided by law, shall be answerable for all money claims or damages that may be awarded to the workers.               If the recruitment/placement agency is a juridical being, the corporate officers and directors and partners as the case may be, shall themselves be jointly and solidarily liable with the corporation or partnership for the aforesaid claims and damages.               Such liabilities shall continue during the entire period or duration of the employment contract and shall not be affected by any substitution, amendment or modification made locally or in a foreign country of the said contract.               On the other hand, respondent Skills International insists that this Petition should be dismissed as it seeks a review of the factual findings of the Labor Arbiter, the NLRC, and the Court of Appeals – a task which clearly does not fall within the ambit of a Petition for Review on Certiorari.  Nevertheless, respondent Skills International proceeded to address the matters stated in the Petition.  It contends that although it had previously deployed petitioner abroad, such deployment was for its accredited principal, the Saudi Automotive Services Company and not for Wallan Al Wallan.  While it may be true that Wallan Al Wallan and petitioner met one another at its office, respondent Skills International argues that this does not readily lead to the conclusion that Wallan AlWallan was its accredited principal.  As one of its officers is from the Middle East, respondent Skills International avers that it is customary that it invites visitors from said region to come to their office.             Anent the medical examination which was undergone by petitioner, respondent Skills International claims that it could not have possibly recommended