4/20/2021 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly decision in the Solar Team Entertainment, Inc. case contained a directive that, for the guidance of the bench and the bar, strictest compliance with Section 11 of Rule 13 is mandated one month from the promulgation of the said decision. Petitioners thus have no excuse for their non-compliance with the requirements embodied therein. WHEREFORE, premises considered, the resolutions of the Court of Appeals dated December 27, 1999 and March 03, 2000 are hereby AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED. Melo, (Chairman), Vitug, Panganiban, and Sandoval-Gutierrez, JJ., concur. [1] Annex "J" of Petition; Rollo, pp. 153-154. [2] Annex "K" of Petition; Rollo, pp. 155-156. [3] Court of Appeals Records, pp. 7-36. [4] Petition, p. 3; Rollo, p. 9. [5] Annex "A" of Petition; Rollo, pp. 40-43. [6] Petition, p. 4; Rollo, p. 10. [7] Annex "F" of Petition; Rollo, pp. 47-51. [8] Annex "G" of Petition; Rollo, pp. 52-58. [9] Annex "I" of Petition; Rollo, pp. 65-67. [10] Annex "J" of Petition; Rollo, p. 68. [11] Annex "K" of Petition; Rollo, p. 69. [12] Court of Appeals Records, p. 31. [13] Melo vs. Court of Appeals, 318 SCRA 94; Tomarong vs. Lubguban, 269 SCRA 624. [14] Ortiz vs. Court of Appeals, 299 SCRA 708; Far Eastern Shipping Co. vs. Court of Appeals, 297 SCRA 30. [15] Dar, et al, vs. Alonzo-Legasto, G.R. No. 143016, August 30, 2000 citing Regalado, Remedial Law Compendium, Volume I, Sixth Revised Edition (1997). https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/52244 6/7