329
ELECTRIC VEHICLES
and the automotive industry, with the guidance and standard-setting
functions being provided by the Government?
Mr. DUNLOP. I don't see any other way, sir, to have it resolved.
We can't conduct our business in a vacuum. The automobile industry
can't do likewise. I think you have got to look at a systems approach,
if you will, to this problem.
Senator
BAKER.
I agree.
One more question, if I may. You referred to the percentage improvement in hydrocarbons and hydrocarbon emissions, and indicated
that we might reach the point of 90-percent improvement. With some
rough arithmetic, if we start with the assumption that an uncontrolled internal combustion engine of typical design and performance would produce about 1,300 parts per million of unburned hydrocarbons, if we improved it to 90 percent it would still be at 130 parts
per million. According to the testimony received in Los Angeles, this
would be intolerable.
Those figures I don't vouch for, by the way, but does that generally
coincide with your views?
Mr. DUNLOP. Those figures are different, frankly, than those that
I have in mind. I would be pleased to submit for the committee, if you
wish, the precise figures. The figures that I had in mind, frankly,
were a little lower than that. They were between somewhere in the
neighborhood of 500 to 600 pounds of hydrocarbons per vehicle per
year. Somewhere in that level.
And this, frankly, I would like to check, sir, rather than making a
statement at this point in time.
Senator BAKER. I would be most happy to have that.
Senator BAYH. Without objection, we would be glad to have any
statistical data that you have to include in the record.
Mr. DUNLOP. I did quote figures, 1.5 per car down to 0.5 pounds per
vehicle per day. If you take 1.5 a day, you are dealing in the neighborhood of 530 pounds per year.
Senator BAKER. The indication the committee received in Los Angeles was that the ultimate objective, in order to improve and then
stabilize the atmospheric situation of the Los Angeles Basin, for
example, would be in the range of 35 to 50 parts per million.
Mr. DUNLOP. I would agree with that. That is the general objective
to which we are striving.
Senator BAKER. Do you think it is attainable?
Mr. DUNLOP. Yes. Let me say-I don't want to make an unequivocal
statement obviously-I think they are within the bounds of realism.
Put it that way at this point.
(Subsequently, Mr. Dunlop submitted the following correspondence
for the record:)
AMERICAN PETROLEUM
INSTITUTE,
New York, N.Y., April 3, 1967.
Hon. JENNINGS RANDOLPH,
Chairman, U.S. Senate Committee on Public Works, New Senate Office Building,
Washington, D.C.
DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: During our testimony before the Subcommittee on Air
and Water Pollution and the Committee on Commerce on March 17, 1967 on S.
451 and S. 453 on behalf of the American Petroleum Institute, we indicated our
intention to supplement and elaborate on our remarks regarding the accomplishments to date and the prospects for increased control of motor vehicle emissions
powered by internal-combustion engines.
79-607 0-67-22
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents