Phil. Integrated Labor Assistance Corporation vs NLRC : 123354 : N...
http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1996/nov1996/123354.htm
[21]
for such violations and for the corresponding award.
However, considering that Dayag failed
to appeal the monetary award given by the POEA, we cannot therefore grant her the additional
[22]
affirmative relief constituting the 15-day indemnity award
award which the POEA and the
NLRC failed to grant.
ACCORDINGLY, finding no grave abuse of discretion, this petition is DISMISSED, and the
decision appealed from is AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED.
Narvasa, C.J., (Chairman), Davide, Jr., Melo, and Panganiban, JJ., concur.
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
Department of Social Welfare and Development.
A graduate of St. Paul University, Tuguegarao, Cagayan with a degree of B.S. in Social Work.
Rollo, p. 123.
She passed two interview and attended seminars at the POEA and PHILAC.
Rollo, p. 124.
Annex 5, Rollo, p. 70.
Rollo, p. 125.
Rollo, p. 127.
[9]
Petition, p. 20, Rollo, p. 28.
[10]
Rollo, p. 31.
[11]
Rollo, p. 94.
[12]
PHILACs memorandum of Appeal to the NLRC, Annex G, Rollo, p. 95.
[13]
Rollo, p. 134.
[14]
Petition, p. 8; Rollo, p. 16.
[15]
Reno Foods, Inc. vs. NLRC, 249 SCRA 379; Marcelo vs. NLRC. 310 Phil. 891.
[16]
See: Magnolia Corporation vs. NLRC, 250 SCRA 332.
[17]
Anderson vs. NLRC, G.R. 111212, Jan 22, 1996; Agoy vs. NLRC, G.R. 112096, Jan. 30, 1996; Western
Shipping Agency vs. NLRC G.R. 109717, Feb. 9, 1996; Tierra International vs. NLRC G.R. 101825, April 2, 1996;
Cuales vs. NLRC, 121 SCRA 812; A.M. Oreta vs. NLRC, 176 SCRA 218; Teknika Skills and Trade Services, Inc. vs.
NLRC; 212 SCRA 132; Philippine Manpower Services, Inc. vs. NLRC, 224 SCRA 691.
[18]
Annex 3, Rollo, p. 50.
[19]
See: Lakas ng Manggagawang Makabayan vs. Abiera, 36 SCRA 437; Boman Environmental Devt. Corp vs.
Court of Appeals, 167 SCRA 540.
[20]
Article 1377, New Civil Code; Gonzales vs. La Provisora Filipina, 74 Phil. 165; Government of the Philippines
vs. Derham Bros., 36 Phil. 960.
[21]
Sec. 1. Rule II, Book II of the POEA Rules and Regulations; See also Teknika Skills case, supra.
[22]
See: Medida vs. CA, 208 SCRA 887; Nessia vs. Fermin, 220 SCRA 617; Dizon vs. NLRC, 181 SCRA 472; SMI
Fish Industries, Inc. vs. NLRC, 213 SCRA 444; Makati Haberdashery, Inc. vs. NLRC, 179 SCRA 448.
3 of 3
1/20/2016 3:29 PM