5/28/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly entitled to compensation according to the provisions of this Agreement. (emphasis ours)[30] xxxx In sum, we find that the NLRC did not abuse its discretion. It arrived at a proper decision after fully appreciated of the parties’ arguments and carefully considering the presented evidence. Thus, there was no basis for the CA’s conclusion that the NLRC committed grave abuse of discretion. WHEREFORE, we hereby GRANT the petition. The Court of Appeals' Decision dated February 25, 2007 in CA-G.R. SP No. 113661, and its Resolution dated September 14, 2011 are SET ASIDE. Accordingly, the December 21, 2009 Decision of the National Labor Relations Commission is hereby REINSTATED. SO ORDERED. Carpio, (Chairperson), Del Castillo, Perez, and Perlas-Bernabe, JJ., concur. [1] Penned by Associate Justice Ramon R. Garcia, and concurred in by Associate Justices Rosmari D. Carandang and Justice Manuel M. Barrios. [2] Rollo, p. 43. [3] Ibid. [4] Id. at 44. [5] Ibid. [6] Id. at 45. [7] Ibid. [8] Ibid. [9] Id. at 46. [10] Ibid. [11] Id. at 82-83. [12] Id. at 61-74. elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/56877 7/9