Previous 16 / 16 Next

6/7/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly eight months and 21 days - is fixed in the absence of any aggravating circumstance, or of any showing of the greater extent of the evil produced by the crime, to which is then added the incremental penalty of one year for every P10,000.00 in excess of P22,000.00. x x x"). [22] See Nacar v. Gallery Frames, G.R. No. 189871, August 13, 2013, 703 SCRA 439, 459. Source: Supreme Court E-Library This page was dynamically generated by the E-Library Content Management System (E-LibCMS) elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/62691 16/16

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

People of the Philippines vs. Owen Marcelo Cagalingan and Beatriz B. Cagalingan

Jurisprudence

Case number: G.R. No. 198664

Division: PH Supreme Court First Division

Date of decision: Nob 23, 2016

Year of decision: 2016

Nature of the case: ILLEGAL RECRUITMENT

MRO Case Type

Estafa
Illegal recruitment
Money claims
Trafficking in persons

Summary of outcome: The Court found the accused spouses guilty of illegal recruitment in large scale and three (3) counts of Estafa under Article 315(2)(a) of the Revised Penal Code.

It was proven that the accused spouses were not licensed or authorized to engage in recruitment activities. The spouses induced, offered, and promised complainants that they would be employed in Macau, China for two (2)years, in exchange for fees. The complainants were made to believe that the accused were capable of sending them to Macau for work.

Observatory: Migrant Workers Rights

Ponente: BERSAMIN, J.

Notes: The acts complained of took place in Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines.

Primary Documents

2016_People of the Philippines vs. Owen Marcelo Cagalingan and Beatriz B. Cagalingan_November.pdf
English
Download View

Commission on Human Rights

Select target paragraph3

People of the Philippines vs. Owen Marcelo Cagalingan and Beatriz B. Cagalingan

Primary Documents

Notifications