to Nueva Ecija with his employer to buy vegetables to be resold at a public market
in Bulacan. Padlan claimed that he returned to the Bulacan public market at about
2:00 a.m. the following morning.
On September 27, 2005 at around 12:00 noon, Padlan claimed that he was resting
inside the house of "AAA" after selling vegetables at the public market. After about
an hour, he took a bath and went back to the market to collect payments from the
buyer of his vegetables. He claimed that he collected payments until 12:00
midnight.
On September 28, 2005, at around 11:00 a.m., Padlan rested at home after selling
vegetables. He took a bath, ate, and watched television. He claimed that he did not
have any encounter with "AAA" and that he was surprised to learn that he was
being accused of rape. After being confronted by "BBB," Padlan insisted that he did
not know anything about the accusations of rape against him.
Ruling of the Regional Trial Court
On November 10, 2011, the RTC of Malolos City, Bulacan, Branch 18 rendered
judgment finding Padlan guilty as charged. The RTC was convinced that the
prosecution, through the testimonies of "AAA" and her mother, was able to
establish the guilt of Padlan beyond reasonable doubt.
The dispositive part of the RTC's Joint Decision reads:
WHEREFORE, accused Amante L. Padlan, as his guilt in these three cases has been
proven beyond reasonable doubt, is hereby sentenced:
a) In Criminal Case No. 2755-M-2005, to suffer reclusion perpetua and to pay
private victim civil indemnity in the amount of P50,000.00 and moral damages in
the amount of P50,000.00;
b) In Criminal Case No. 2756-M-2005, to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua
and to pay private victim civil indemnity in the amount of P50,000.00 and moral
damages in the amount of P50,000.00; and
c) In Criminal Case No. 2757-M-2005, to suffer the imprisonment five (5) months
and eleven (11) days of arresto mayor and two (2) years, four (4) months and one
(1) day of prision correccional.
SO ORDERED.[7]
Aggrieved by the RTC's Joint Decision, Padlan appealed to the CA.