PROPOSED KEY ACTIVITIES I. Preparatory period  Drafting of MOAs for GAs, IPO/CSO  Listing / vetting of IP participants  Partnering with government agencies, civil society organizations and IP grassroots  Listing of current IP programs of the government  Levelling off on conceptual framework (pre-inquiry brief – sec 2 rule 6 of the CHR Rules of Procedure on National Inquiry);  Discussion and securing adoption of MOAs  Conduct of a donors’ forum  Securing of direct FPIC (Free, Prior, Informed Consent) from target IP communities / participants (IP community should copy-furnish formal FPIC declarations to the NCIP)  Secure internal CHR funding and shared funding with GAs through MOA)  Validation of IP participants, c/o CSOs and IPO partners  Extend invitation to AICHR (ASEAN Inter Government Commission on Human Rights), Myanmar NHRI, Malaysia NHRI (SUHAKAM) and Indonesia NHRI (KOMNAS HAM), Thailand NHRI as observers to the inquiry. These countries with the same situation like Philippines. It is important to see their perspectives.  Secure CHR En Banc resolution for the conduct of the national inquiry ) II. National Convening Assembly  Signing of MOAs based on levelling off of framework and methodology  Presentation of design of inquiry and timeline  Identification and designation of area coordinators of the four (4) site fora  Formal designation of the TWG  Announcement of secured FPIC by the IP communities to be involved III. Areas of Assemblies i. Two (2) Mindanao Area Assemblies – it seems that 64% of the IPs is in Mindanao ii. Visayas Area and two (2) Luzon Area Assemblies IV. Circulation of TWG recommendations through email correspondences to all parties V. Solidarity (Culmination) Assembly 72