AGENCY CURRENT MONITORING MECHANISMS EFFECTIVENESS CHALLENGES Project monitoring team: Chairperson – Regional Director (RD) Members: Provincial Officers Chief, Technical Services Division COA is part of the monitoring system Monitoring indicators: – monthly; impact; if it creates a change in the quality of life; additional income Best Livelihood Program national competition with cash reward but not specific to IP. CROSS-CUTTING PROPOSAL/RECOMMENDATION Regional Development Council (RDC) will do the following:  to formulate an inter-agency monitoring committee;  to facilitate the development of a rights-inspired monitoring framework to be submitted to NEDA; and;  to validate and mainstream the IP framework in the regional development plan. In SUMMARY All agencies have varying levels of implementation including sensitization on IP concerns e.g. IP Desk and IP Sensitive programs. COMMON CHALLENGES  Lack of documentation and disaggregation of data on IPs  Lack of capacity to formulate IP-based development proposals  Political interference  Mismatch of programs and plans of National and Local Government Unit  Lack of convergence among government line agencies concerning IP programs WAYS FORWARD:  Pursue the ethnographic survey with simultaneous efforts at the LGU level to effectively institute appropriate documentation data base building towards evidence based effective planning  Develop appropriate guidelines and mechanism for different procedures for FPIC 62