Table 10: Scale-up Coverage of FP Priority Strategies and its Impact in mCPR Growth Priority Strategies PPFP FP Outreach Missions Demand Generation FP Stockout Reduction Public Sector Availability Interventions Facility-based PPFP Community-based PPFP FP-EPI Integration No. of Itinerant Teams Average Clients per Team Comprehensive Community Engagement Interpersonal Communication Average proportion of health facilities reported stockout Average proportion of method availability in public health facilities TOTAL POTENTIAL GROWTH Baseline (2018) End line (2022) mCPR (% pts) 40% 36% 3% 173 5,190 ÇÇ ÇÇ ÇÇ ÇÇ 70% 50% 10% 414 3.67% 5% 20% 29% ÇÇ ÇÇ ÈÈ 10% 27% 70% 0.06% 0.27% 2.51% 50% ÇÇ 70% 0.33% Source: Family Planning Goals Model Estimates,Track20, 2019 0.04% 6.88% Figure 18: Annual Trend and Average Growth Rate in mCPR (AW) versus the NOH Target Source: NDHS 2017 and Family Planning Goals Model Estimates,Track20, 2019. total potential growth in mCPR at the sub-national level. The projected growth in mCPR varies across regions with the highest growth projected in Region VIII at nine percentage points followed by Regions IV-A, IV-B, IX, and BARMM. On the other hand, Region II has the lowest expected mCPR growth as it has the highest baseline mCPR at 40 percent in 2017. Sustaining the current FP users, with no dropouts, should be the priority of this region. 51 2019 Annual Report Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012 51 2019 Annual Report Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012