[30] Id. at 187. [31] Peñaflor v. Outdoor Clothing Manufacturing Corporation, G.R. No. 177114. January 21, 2010, 610 SCRA 497, 506. [32] Plantation Bay Resort and Spa v. Dubrico, G.R. No. 182216, December 4, 2009, 607 SCRA 726, 731-732; citing PNOC Dockyard & Engineering Corp. v. National Labor Relations Commission, 353 Phil. 431, 445 (1998). [33] Sevillana v. I.T. (International) Corp./Samir Maddah & Travellers Insurance and Surety Corporation, 408 Phil. 570, 579 (2001). [34] Rollo, pp. 57-58. [35] Id. at 94-95. [36] As discussed previously, these were attached to petitioner's Reply filed with the Court of Appeals. (CA rollo, pp. 253 and 256.) [37] Rollo, p. 36. [38] Id. at 42-44. [39] Id. at 33. [40] Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. and/or Chemical Bank v. Guerrero, 445 Phil. 770, 777 (2003). [41] G.R. No. 179402, September 30, 2008, 567 SCRA 291. [42] Id. at 305. [43] In the body of the Court of Appeals' Decision dated May 31, 2005, the amount of permanent medical unfitness benefits was correctly computed as US$50,000.00 x 14.93% = US$7,465.00. However, the dispositive portion of said Decision erroneously stated that the permanent medical unfitness benefits to be awarded was US$7,480.00. Source: Supreme Court E-Library This page was dynamically generated by the E-Library Content Management System (E-LibCMS)