6/30/2021 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly [24] Id. at 61-62. [25] Id. at 58-67. [26] Id. at 66. [27] Id. at 68-82, 87-95. [28] Id. at 84-86. [29] Id. at 39. [30] See Far Eastern Surety and Insurance Co., Inc. vs. People, 721 Phil. 760, 770 (2013), citing Remalante vs. Tibe, 241 Phil. 930, 935 (1988). [31] See New City Builders, Inc. v. NLRC, 499 Phil. 207, 213 (2005), stating therein the following exceptional circumstances: (1) when the findings are grounded entirely on speculation, surmises or conjectures; (2) when the inference made is manifestly mistaken, absurd or impossible; (3) when there is grave abuse of discretion; (4) when the judgement is based on a misapprehension of facts; (5) when the findings of facts are conflicting; (6) when in marking its findings the Court of Appeals went beyond the issues of the case, or its findings are contrary to the admissions of both the appellant and the appellee; (7) when the findings are contrary to the trial court; (8) when the findings are conclusions without citation of specific evidence on which they are based; (9) when the facts set forth in the petition as well as in the petitioner's main and reply briefs are not disputed by the respondents; (10) when the findings of facts are premised on the supposed absence of evidence contradicted by the evidence on record; and (11) when the Court of Appeals manifestly overlooked certain relevant facts not disputed by the parties, which, if properly considered, would justify a different conclusion. [32] Rollo, p. 40. [33] Id. [34] Id. [35] Id. at 47. [36] Id. at 64. [37] Id. [38] Id. at 64-65. https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/66746 10/11