4/15/2021 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly II. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS GRAVELY ERRED UNDER THE RULES AND PREVAILING JURISPRUDENCE WHEN IT DID NOT ALSO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED BEFORE IT BY HEREIN RESPONDENTS FOR THEIR WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE ACTS OF FORUM SHOPPING. III. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS GRAVELY ERRED UNDER THE LAW AND THE RULES WHEN IT DID NOT DISMISS RESPONDENTS' PETITION FOR REVIEW ON THE ADDITIONAL GROUND THAT RESPONDENTS MOTION FOR THE RECONSIDERATION OF THE VA PANEL'S DECISION OF 02 FEBRUARY 2015 WAS NOT DULY FILED. IV. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS GRAVELY ERRED UNDER THE RULES AND COMMITTED GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION WHEN IT DISREGARDED THE WELL-ENTRENCHED RULE THAT FACTUAL FINDINGS OF QUASIJUDICIAL BODIES ARE ACCORDED NOT ONLY GREAT RESPECT BUT EVEN FINALITY. A. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS GRAVELY ERRED AND COMMITTED GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION WHEN IT REVERSED THE FINDING OF THE VA PANEL A QUO THAT NO ADEQUATE EVIDENCE EXITS THAT SEAFARER BORRETA, JR. COMMITTED SUICIDE. B. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS GRAVELY ERRED UNDER THE LAW AND COMMITTED GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION WHEN IT REVERSED THE FINDING OF THE VA PANEL A QUO HOLDING RESPONDENTS LIABLE TO PAY INSURANCE BENEFIT[S] UNDER R.A. 10022. C. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS GRAVELY ERRED AND COMMITTED GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION WHEN IT REVERSED THE RULING OF THE VA PANEL A QUO HOLDING RESPONDENTS LIABLE FOR CBA MANDATED OVERTIME PAY, LEAVE PAY, SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCE AND OWNER’S BONUS. D. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS GRAVELY ERRED UNDER THE LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE AND COMMITTED GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION WHEN IT REVERSED THE VA PANEL’S AWARD OF MORAL AND EXEMPLARY DAMAGES AND ATTORNEY’S FEES.[46] The Arguments of the Parties https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/66237 8/37