employee is not an acceptable ground to annul the compromise agreement[36] unless it is accompanied by a gross disparity between the actual claim and the amount of the settlement.[37]    A perusal of the records reveals that petitioners were not in any way deceived, coerced or intimidated into signing a quitclaim waiver in the amounts of P13,640, P15,080 and P16,200 respectively.  Nor was there a disparity between the amount of the quitclaim and the amount actually due the petitioners.    Conformably then the petitioners are entitled to the following amounts in Philippine Peso at the rate of exchange prevailing at the time of payment: 1.  MERCEDITA ACUÑA      a.  Salary for 4 days      b.  Overtime pay for 4 hours in 4 days       2.  JULIET C. MENDEZ      a. Salary for 4 days      b.  Overtime pay for 4 hours in 4 days     3.  MYRNA R. RAMONES      a. Salary for 4 days      b. Overtime pay for 4 hours in 4 days          NT $ 2,436.92 1,523.07 NT $ 3,959.99     NT $  2,436.92 1,523.07 NT $  3,959.99     NT $  2,436.92 1,523.07 NT $  3,959.99 According to the Bangko Sentral Treasury Department, the prevailing exchange rates on December 1999 was NT$1 toP1.268805.  Hence, after conversion to Philippine pesos, the amount of the quitclaim paid to petitioners was actually higher than the amount due them.   WHEREFORE, the petition is DISMISSED, without prejudice to the filing of illegal recruitment complaint against the respondents pursuant to Section 6(i) of  The Migrant Workers and Overseas Filipino Act of 1995 (Rep. Act No. 8042).