[22] J. Villarama, Jr. [23] Petition for Review on Certiorari, 22-23; Id. at 49-50. [24] Revised Standard Employment Terms and Conditions Governing the Employment of Filipino Seafarers on Board Ocean-Going Vessels. [25] Two of Arbits co-crew members issued sworn statements that Arbit was negligent in the performance of his duties as Tug Master. [26] In Employees Association of the Philippine American Life Insurance Co. v. NLRC (G.R. No. 82976, July 26, 1991, 199 SCRA 628), the established exceptions are as follows: a) the conclusion is a finding of fact grounded on speculations, surmises and conjectures; b) the inferences made are manifestly mistaken, absurd or impossible; c) there is a grave abuse of discretion; d) there is misappreciation of facts; and e) the court, in arriving in its findings, went beyond the issues of the case and the same are contrary to the admission of the parties or the evidence presented. [27] CA Rollo, 87. [28] Rollo, 111. [29] Decision of Labor Arbiter Ermita T. Abrasaldo-Cuyuca, 14-16; Rollo, 111-113. [30] CA Decision, 8-9; Rollo, 16-17. [31] G.R. No. 130772, November 19, 1999, 318 SCRA 623. [32] Memorandum on Appeal, 22-23; CA Rollo, 170-171. [33] Dated July 23, 1996. [34] Memorandum on Appeal, 21; CA Rollo, 169. [35] This rate is applicable to impediment grade nine (9). [36] Petitioners Motion for Reconsideration, 22; Rollo, 160. [37] Supra Note 31. [38] Supra Note 29. [39] Philippine Transmarine Carriers, Inc. v. NLRC, G.R. No. 123891, February 28, 2001, 353 SCRA 47. [40] CA Decision, 9; Rollo, 17.